# Scoring

How the numbers and the verdicts are made, written out so you can check them. `scorer/scorer.py` and `scorer/scorer.js` do the sums; take every number from them. This file is for reading and for the case where you cannot run code. Generated by `tools/build-pack.py`, which reads the numbers out of `scorer/scorer.py`; `tools/test-pack.py` runs the script at the edges to confirm them.

## Step 1: how serious one answer is

Each answer is rated from 1 to 5 for the question it answers. A select question has a table of ratings, in the appendix. A scale question is rated by its number. A signal that carries a `when` list (appendix B) is rated 4 when the answer shares a value with the list, and 0 otherwise; for a pick-all question the answer is split at its separator first, so one chosen option is enough. Two questions have a rule of their own, in appendix A: the number of countries chosen, and the two staff ranges. A blank or unrecognised answer rates 0 and is left out. A pick-all question has no table, so its answers rate 0 unless a `when` list reads them or the whole joined string is in the table.

## Step 2: the scores for one use case

The scoring map gives each use case a list of signals. A signal is a question id, a weight and a role: need, scale, readiness or fit boost. For each role, the score is the weighted average of the ratings of the signals that have an answer: the sum of rating times weight, divided by the sum of weights. A role with no answered signal scores 0.

- Problem magnitude, the number that ranks use cases: 0.6 of the need score plus 0.4 of the scale score, rounded to one decimal place, on a scale of 0 to 5. It is 0 when no signal of any role has an answer, and the use case is then listed as not judged.
- Fit: the use case starts from its own fit score in the scoring map (2.5 if none). The fit boost score raises it: fit = start + (5 - start) x (boost / 5) x 0.4. It cannot pass 5.
- Readiness for the use case: 5 minus the readiness score, so a high rating on a readiness signal means the organisation lacks something. With no readiness answer it is 2.5, and the output says the source is the default.
- Work with other agencies: for the use cases the scoring map tags that way, the interagency answer adds 0.3 to fit and to problem magnitude if it is central or partial, and 0.1 if unsure. It cannot pass 5.

## Step 3: gates

Each use case has a fit gate and a readiness gate (2.5 if the map gives none; the table at the end lists them). A score at or above its gate passes. A score within 1.0 below the gate is borderline. Lower fails. A use case with no answered signal has no data.

## Step 4: tiers and the short list

Tiers read problem magnitude:

| Tier | Problem magnitude |
|---|---|
| high | 3.5 and above |
| medium | 2.0 and above |
| low | 1.0 and above |
| minimal | under 1.0 |

A use case with no answered signal has the tier not-enough-information, and is kept out of the ranking. The top ten takes at least 2 and at most 4 use cases per selected category, and ten in all, highest problem magnitude first.

Sector minimums. If the sector is known, the script raises problem magnitude for some use cases to a minimum, and the output says so in `floorApplied` and `floorReason`. A use case that reaches its score only through a minimum is listed as not judged for lack of answers.

- agriculture: UC-D-053 2.5; UC-A-001 2; UC-B-024 1.5
- community: UC-B-024 1.5; UC-A-001 2
- education: UC-B-024 1.5; UC-C-039 2; UC-A-001 1.5
- human_rights: UC-C-039 2.5; UC-B-024 2
- humanitarian: UC-B-024 2.5; UC-B-025 2; UC-C-039 2; UC-A-001 2; UC-D-053 2
- wash: UC-D-053 2.5; UC-C-039 2

## Step 5: the readiness check of the organisation

The 14 questions about the organisation fall in five areas:

- Governance and authority (D1): 3 questions
- Financial resources (D2): 1 question
- Operational readiness (D3): 3 questions
- Technical capability (D4): 3 questions
- Data readiness (D5): 4 questions

An area's score is the average of its answers. An area with no answer scores 0 and is left out of everything below. The script then adjusts the area scores for the organisation's context. An area cannot pass 5.

| Area | Change | When |
|---|---|---|
| Financial resources | plus 0.3 | the organisation keeps a digital registration platform or database |
| Operational readiness | plus 0.3 | it takes part in a cluster, consortium or working group |
| Operational readiness | plus 0.2 | its governance is a board or a federation |
| Technical capability | plus 0.3 | it shares data with partners regularly |
| Operational readiness | plus 0.2 | it names three or more risk management practices |
| Financial resources | plus 0.3 | the operating context is active conflict, post-conflict, restrictive or hostile, in economic crisis or one of protracted displacement, and this is lacking: the organisation keeps a digital registration platform or database |
| Operational readiness | plus 0.3 | the operating context is active conflict, post-conflict, restrictive or hostile, in economic crisis or one of protracted displacement, and this is lacking: it takes part in a cluster, consortium or working group |
| Operational readiness | plus 0.2 | the operating context is active conflict, post-conflict, restrictive or hostile, in economic crisis or one of protracted displacement, and this is lacking: its governance is a board or a federation |
| Technical capability | plus 0.3 | the operating context is active conflict, post-conflict, restrictive or hostile, in economic crisis or one of protracted displacement, and this is lacking: it shares data with partners regularly |
| Operational readiness | plus 0.2 | the operating context is active conflict, post-conflict, restrictive or hostile, in economic crisis or one of protracted displacement, and this is lacking: it names three or more risk management practices |

Thresholds. Each use case has a bar for each area. The script takes the use case's three complexity factors, adjusts them for the organisation's size and context, and sets the bar as follows: the base is 2.5 plus (the use case's base complexity total minus 9) divided by 6; each area's bar is the base plus 1.5 times (the area's importance minus 0.2), kept between 1.0 and 4.5. The importance of an area is a mix of three rows, one per factor, weighted by each factor's share of the three adjusted factors added together. Factor 1 is relationships, factor 2 is operational change and factor 3 is data and compliance. Factor 3 uses the right-hand column if the organisation has compliance staff. The script prints the bars and the importance it used.

| Area | Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 3, with compliance staff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Governance and authority | 0.45 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Financial resources | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.05 |
| Operational readiness | 0.35 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Technical capability | 0.05 | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Data readiness | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.60 | 0.75 |

A gap is the bar minus the area score, when positive. The combined gap is the sum of the gaps, each times its area's importance. The largest single gap is the biggest of them.

Conditions. An area scoring more than 1.0 below its bar is a significant condition. Any area below its bar is a moderate one. An area less than 0.5 above its bar is a minor one. The script also adds conditions from the context (for example a connection that is often down).

## Step 6: the verdict

The script tests these rules in this order and stops at the first that fires. "Rating" means the highest rating among the deep-dive answers for the use case's category.

Outcomes map to the four verdicts in the brief: PROCEED is yes, PROCEED_WITH_CONDITIONS is yes with conditions, NOT_NOW is yes, once these change, EXPLORE_ALTERNATIVES is no (use something simpler). NOT_ASSESSED, and the rule no-part-a, mean no verdict yet.

The script prints its own sentence for the rule. Do not copy it into the brief: it uses older words. Use the sentence in the last column, which is the wording the brief uses (templates/brief.md says how to fill the capitals).

| Order | Rule | Outcome | When | Sentence in the brief |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | no-part-b | NOT_ASSESSED | None of the five use-case questions was answered. | The questions about this problem were not answered, so no decision was reached. |
| 2 | low-parties-frequency-impact | EXPLORE_ALTERNATIVES | At least two use-case answers exist, and the answers for parties involved, how often, and size of effect are all 1. | Few parties are involved, the problem is rare and the effect is small, so a shared ledger adds little. |
| 3 | single-party | EXPLORE_ALTERNATIVES | At least two use-case answers exist, the answer for parties involved is 1, and the highest rating among the deep-dive answers for the category is under 3. | With only your organisation involved, a shared ledger adds little. |
| 4 | no-part-a | PROCEED_WITH_CONDITIONS | No readiness area has an answer. The verdict in the brief is No verdict yet, whatever the outcome says. | The questions about your organisation were not answered, so readiness could not be judged. |
| 5 | large-gap-severity-override | PROCEED_WITH_CONDITIONS | The largest single gap is over 1.5, and the highest deep-dive rating is 4.5 or more. | Your readiness in DIMNAME is well below what this problem calls for, which would normally mean waiting. You described a severe problem (rated SEV of 5), so the answer is yes, with conditions. |
| 6 | large-single-gap | NOT_NOW | The largest single gap is over 1.5, and the highest deep-dive rating is under 4.5. | One readiness gap is large enough that your organisation should close it before anything else. It is named below. |
| 7 | gaps-cleared | PROCEED | The combined gap is 0.2 or less. | Taken together, your answers about your organisation come close enough to what this problem calls for. |
| 8 | light-gaps | PROCEED_WITH_CONDITIONS | The combined gap is over 0.2 and at most 0.5. | Small gaps remain between your answers about your organisation and what this problem calls for. They can be closed while you run a pilot. |
| 9 | modest-gaps-severe-problem | PROCEED | The combined gap is over 0.5 and at most 0.8, and the highest deep-dive rating is 4 or more. | The gaps in your readiness are modest and you described a severe problem, so the answer is yes. |
| 10 | heavier-gaps | PROCEED_WITH_CONDITIONS | The combined gap is over 0.5 and at most 1.5, and the previous rule does not apply. | Several gaps remain between your answers about your organisation and what this problem calls for. Close them before or during a pilot. |
| 11 | total-gap-severity-override | PROCEED_WITH_CONDITIONS | The combined gap is over 1.5, and the highest deep-dive rating is 4.5 or more. | Your readiness gaps add up to a lot, which would normally mean waiting. You described a severe problem (rated SEV of 5), so the answer is yes, with conditions. |
| 12 | total-gap-too-large | NOT_NOW | The combined gap is over 1.5, and the highest deep-dive rating is under 4.5. | Taken together, the gaps in your readiness are too large to start now. |

In the two override rules and in modest-gaps-severe-problem, a severe problem pushes a verdict one step in the person's favour. Say that when you explain the verdict.

A use case's own fit gate, read in step 3, is shown beside the verdict. A yes where the fit gate fails carries a caution in the brief.

## Appendix A: the rating of each answer

For every select question the interview asks, and the two questions with a rule of their own. Anything not listed rates 0.

### NGO-P0-S1-Q7
Count the options chosen, leaving out any that start with Other.
- 1 or fewer: 1
- 2 or fewer: 2
- 4 or fewer: 3
- 9 or fewer: 4
- more than that: 5

### NGO-P0-S2-Q7
The answer is a head office range and a field range. Rate each, and take the higher.
- hq_staff: [1-10] 1; [11-25] 1; [26-50] 2; [51-100] 3; [101-250] 4; [251-500] 5; [500+] 5
- field_staff: [None] 1; [1-25] 1; [26-100] 2; [101-500] 3; [501-1,000] 4; [1,001-5,000] 5; [5,000+] 5

### NGO-P0-S3-Q13
- [Reliable high-speed internet at HQ and field offices] 1
- [Reliable at HQ, intermittent in field locations] 2
- [Intermittent connectivity at both HQ and field] 3
- [Significant connectivity gaps — frequent outages or very low bandwidth] 4
- [Primarily offline — limited or no regular internet access] 5

### NGO-P0-S3-Q13b
- [Grid power reliable across operating areas] 1
- [Grid available, occasional outages, generator backup at HQ] 2
- [Generator or solar primary at field sites, grid intermittent] 3
- [Solar or generator only at field sites, fuel and charge availability variable] 4
- [No reliable power at field sites; charging is a constraint on operations] 5

### NGO-P0-S4-Q14a
- [Under $1M] 1
- [$1M-$5M] 2
- [$5M-$10M] 3
- [$10M-$50M] 4
- [$50M-$100M] 5
- [$100M-$500M] 5
- [Over $500M] 5

### NGO-P0-S4-Q14b
- [Stable] 1
- [Declining] 2
- [Growing moderately] 3
- [Growing significantly (20%+ YoY)] 4
- [Volatile (swings with emergency funding cycles)] 5

### NGO-P0-S5-Q17b
- [Not applicable (we deliver directly)] 1
- [Under 5] 2
- [5-20] 3
- [20-50] 4
- [Over 50] 5

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q1
- [Simple — single step, one intermediary, straightforward] 1
- [Moderate — 2-3 steps, some manual handoffs] 2
- [Complex — 4+ steps, multiple intermediaries, manual reconciliation] 3
- [Very complex — many steps, multiple currencies, delays common, reconciliation difficult] 4
- [Extremely complex — fragmented across systems, major delays, high failure rate] 5

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q2
- [None] 1
- [1-2] 2
- [3-5] 3
- [6-10] 4
- [More than 10] 5

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q29
- [Exciting — we'd welcome it] 1
- [Mixed — some areas yes, some areas we'd worry about] 2
- [Concerning — our data isn't clean enough for that] 3
- [Terrifying — there are things we'd need to fix first] 4

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q3
- [Same day] 1
- [1-3 days] 1
- [4-7 days] 2
- [1-2 weeks] 3
- [More than 2 weeks] 4
- [Highly variable] 4

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q30
- [Key account holder or finance staff departure] 3
- [Primary bank closes our account or de-risks] 4
- [Currency collapse or severe FX volatility] 4
- [Correspondent bank withdraws service] 4
- [Loss of access to a critical operating country] 5
- [System or technology failure (e.g., accounting platform outage)] 3
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q31
- [cash-adequate] 1
- [periodic-scarcity] 2
- [chronic-scarcity] 3
- [severe-scarcity] 4
- [aid-dependent] 5

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q4
- [Less than 1%] 1
- [1-3%] 2
- [3-5%] 3
- [5-10%] 4
- [10-20%] 5
- [20-30%] 5
- [More than 30%] 5
- [Unknown] 3

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q5
- [No payment difficulties] 1
- [Sanctions-affected country] 4
- [De-risked corridors (bank won't serve)] 5
- [No banking infrastructure] 5
- [FX controls or capital restrictions] 3
- [Correspondent banking withdrawal] 4

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q6
- [Frequently (monthly or more)] 5
- [Occasionally (a few times per year)] 3
- [Rarely (once or twice ever)] 2
- [Never] 1

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q6-followup
- [Minor inconvenience — resolved quickly with no lasting impact] 1
- [Moderate disruption — delayed operations for days, required workarounds] 2
- [Significant disruption — halted some programmes for weeks, financial losses] 3
- [Severe disruption — major programme delays, substantial financial loss, beneficiary impact] 4
- [Critical crisis — operations stopped entirely, emergency response needed] 5

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q7
- [Less than 10%] 1
- [10-25%] 2
- [25-50%] 3
- [50-75%] 4
- [More than 75%] 5

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q8a
- [Daily] 1
- [Weekly] 2
- [Monthly] 3
- [Quarterly] 4
- [Ad hoc] 5

### NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b
- [Less than 1%] 1
- [1-5%] 2
- [5-10%] 3
- [More than 10%] 4
- [Unknown] 3

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q1
- [Less than 5%] 1
- [5-15%] 2
- [15-30%] 3
- [30-50%] 4
- [More than 50%] 5
- [Unknown] 3

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q10
- [Yes, formally through shared platforms or databases] 1
- [Yes, informally through email/phone coordination] 3
- [Partially — some programmes share, others don't] 3
- [No, we do not share beneficiary data with other NGOs] 4
- [We would like to but data protection prevents it] 4

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q10-FU
- [Formal data sharing agreements (DSAs)] 1
- [Informal coordination (email/calls)] 3
- [Shared database/platform] 1
- [Spreadsheet transfers] 4
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a
- [Under 1,000] 1
- [1,000 - 10,000] 2
- [10,000 - 50,000] 3
- [50,000 - 200,000] 4
- [Over 200,000] 5

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b
- [1 centralised system] 1
- [2-3 systems] 2
- [4-6 systems] 3
- [7-10 systems] 4
- [More than 10 systems] 5
- [Don't know] 3

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q1c
- [Under 5% — minimal duplication] 1
- [5-15% — some known duplicates] 2
- [15-30% — significant duplication] 3
- [Over 30% — major duplication problem] 5
- [Unknown — we have no way to check] 4

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q28
- [Loss of the central beneficiary database or registration system] 5
- [Key registration staff departure with no knowledge transfer] 3
- [Biometric hardware failure with no backup verification method] 3
- [Partner organisation loses or corrupts shared beneficiary data] 4
- [Connectivity failure in field locations preventing registration] 3
- [Government changes ID requirements or invalidates existing records] 4
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q3
- [Fully digital — tablet/phone registration with ID verification in under 15 minutes] 1
- [Semi-digital — paper intake then later data entry into a system] 2
- [Mostly manual — paper forms, physical ID copies, manual filing] 4
- [Chaotic — no standard process, varies by location and staff] 5
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q6
- [Yes] 1
- [No] 3

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q6-FU
- [No significant risks encountered] 1
- [Data protection/privacy concerns from beneficiaries or regulators] 3
- [Technical failures — equipment malfunction, poor quality captures] 3
- [Data breach or unauthorized access to biometric records] 5
- [Consent challenges — beneficiaries reluctant or unable to consent] 4
- [Multiple risks — combination of the above] 5
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q8
- [Less than 1%] 1
- [1-5%] 2
- [5-10%] 3
- [10-20%] 4
- [More than 20%] 5
- [Unknown] 3

### NGO-P2-CatB-Q9
- [Records fully portable and accessible in new locations] 1
- [Records transferable with manual intervention] 2
- [Records stay at original location; minimal portability] 4
- [No mechanism for record continuity] 5

### NGO-P2-CatC-Q1
- [Centralised database with formal data governance policies] 1
- [Multiple systems with some governance but no single source of truth] 2
- [Fragmented across spreadsheets, databases, and partner systems] 4
- [Mostly paper-based or ad hoc digital storage] 5
- [No formal data governance — each programme manages its own way] 5
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatC-Q3
- [Single system] 1
- [2-3 systems] 2
- [4-5 systems] 4
- [6+ systems] 5

### NGO-P2-CatC-Q4
- [Automated reconciliation] 1
- [Manual review by data team] 2
- [Ask beneficiary to verify] 3
- [Use data from primary source] 2
- [Ad hoc, case-by-case approach] 4
- [No established process] 5

### NGO-P2-CatC-Q5
- [Continuously (automated)] 1
- [Weekly] 2
- [Monthly] 3
- [Quarterly or less] 4
- [Only when problems surface] 4
- [Never] 5

### NGO-P2-CatC-Q7
- [Yes] 4
- [No] 1

### NGO-P2-CatC-Q7-FU
- [No significant challenges — data reconciliation works well] 1
- [Different data formats and definitions across partners] 3
- [Time lag — reconciliation happens too late to be useful] 3
- [Manual and error-prone — relies on spreadsheet comparison] 4
- [Cannot reconcile — systems are incompatible] 5
- [Trust issues — partners dispute each other's figures] 4
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatC-Q8
- [Full audit logs of all access/modifications] 1
- [Partial logging of major actions] 2
- [Limited visibility; ad hoc reviews] 4
- [No systematic tracking] 5

### NGO-P2-CatC-Q9
- [Loss of central database or server failure] 5
- [Key data staff departure with no documentation] 3
- [Cyber attack or data breach] 5
- [Partner data incompatibility causing data loss] 4
- [Manual data entry errors compounding over time] 3
- [Regulatory change requiring data deletion or restructuring] 4
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q1
- [1-2 tiers] 1
- [3-4 tiers] 2
- [5+ tiers] 4
- [Unknown/varies by programme] 3

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a
- [Under 50 per month] 1
- [50-200 per month] 2
- [200-1,000 per month] 3
- [1,000-5,000 per month] 4
- [Over 5,000 per month] 5

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q1b
- [Under 2% — rare incidents] 1
- [2-5% — occasional problems] 2
- [5-15% — regular problems] 3
- [15-30% — frequent problems] 4
- [Over 30% — systemic failure] 5
- [Unknown — we don't track this] 3

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c
- [1-5 participants] 1
- [6-15 participants] 2
- [16-50 participants] 3
- [51-100 participants] 4
- [Over 100 participants] 5

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q4
- [End-to-end digital tracking from procurement to beneficiary] 1
- [Partially tracked — procurement is digital but last mile is manual] 2
- [Paper-based tracking with periodic digital updates] 3
- [Minimal tracking — we know what was ordered and roughly where it went] 4
- [No systematic tracking — items are procured and distributed informally] 5
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q5
- [Yes] 4
- [No] 1

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q5-FU
- [No significant quality incidents in the last 2 years] 1
- [Minor quality issues — caught before reaching beneficiaries] 2
- [Significant incidents — some affected items reached beneficiaries] 4
- [Major incidents — recalls required, beneficiaries potentially harmed] 5
- [Counterfeit goods discovered in our supply chain] 5
- [Multiple types of quality failures across different supply lines] 5
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q7
- [Yes, comprehensive] 1
- [Yes, but limited/partial] 3
- [No] 5

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q7-FU
- [Full cold chain with continuous temperature monitoring and alerts] 1
- [Adequate cold chain but gaps in monitoring during transport] 2
- [Limited cold chain — some refrigeration but no temperature logging] 3
- [Minimal — rely on cool boxes and ice packs with no monitoring] 4
- [No cold chain capability — not applicable to our goods] 1
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q8
- [Last-mile delivery — goods get lost or diverted before reaching beneficiaries] 5
- [Procurement fraud or supplier reliability issues] 5
- [Cold chain failure — temperature-sensitive goods spoiling in transit] 4
- [Customs and border delays — goods stuck for weeks or months] 3
- [Warehouse/storage loss — theft, damage, or expiry] 4
- [Partner handover — goods lost in transition between organisations] 4
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatD-Q9
- [not-applicable] 1
- [no-verification] 5
- [paper-based] 4
- [third-party-audit] 3
- [established-system] 1

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q1
- [1-3 organisations] 5
- [4-7 organisations] 3
- [8-12 organisations] 2
- [13+ organisations] 1
- [No formal forum] 5

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q10
- [no-tools] 3
- [vendor-locked] 5
- [donor-funded] 4
- [open-source] 2
- [resilient] 1

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q11
- [Decisions are made quickly by a lead organisation — days at most] 1
- [Decisions go through a structured committee process — typically 1-4 weeks] 2
- [Decisions require consensus from multiple agencies — often takes months] 4
- [Decision-making is unclear or inconsistent — depends on who pushes hardest] 5
- [We rarely make joint decisions — each organisation acts independently] 3

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q13
- [Clear accountability — roles are defined, documented, and enforced across all partners] 1
- [Mostly clear — accountability exists on paper but enforcement is inconsistent] 2
- [Partially defined — some areas have clear ownership but gaps exist between organisations] 3
- [Unclear — accountability is assumed rather than documented, leading to blame-shifting] 4
- [No accountability framework — when things go wrong, nobody takes responsibility] 5

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q14
- [Automated verification — systems confirm milestones with real-time data and evidence] 1
- [Structured verification — field visits, photo evidence, or third-party audits on a schedule] 2
- [Self-reported with spot checks — partners report and we verify a sample] 3
- [Mostly self-reported — we rely on partner reports with limited independent verification] 4
- [No systematic verification — we trust partner reports at face value] 5

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a
- [1-3 partners] 1
- [4-10 partners] 2
- [11-25 partners] 3
- [26-50 partners] 4
- [Over 50 partners] 5

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q1b
- [Daily] 1
- [Weekly] 1
- [Monthly] 2
- [Quarterly] 3
- [Ad hoc — only when requested] 5

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q2
- [Digital referral system shared across partner organisations] 1
- [Semi-formal — referral forms (paper or digital) sent between orgs] 2
- [Informal — phone calls or emails between case workers] 4
- [No structured referral process — beneficiaries self-refer] 5
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q3
- [Yes] 4
- [No] 1

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q4
- [Shared database or interoperability platform across organisations] 1
- [Regular coordination meetings where lists are compared manually] 2
- [Informal — we ask beneficiaries if they receive help elsewhere] 4
- [We don't — there is no systematic way to check for overlap] 5
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q7
- [Shared beneficiary database] 1
- [Regular partner meetings to review lists] 1
- [Informal phone/email coordination] 3
- [Ad hoc problem resolution] 4
- [No formal coordination] 5

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q8
- [Yes] 3
- [No] 1

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q8-FU
- [Multiple times per month] 5
- [Monthly] 4
- [Several times per year] 3
- [Rarely] 2
- [Unknown/unmeasured] 3

### NGO-P2-CatE-Q9
- [Key coordination staff departure with no handover] 3
- [Partner organisation withdraws from coordination mechanism] 4
- [Data sharing agreement breaks down or is violated] 4
- [Political interference disrupts coordination structure] 5
- [Funding cut to coordination function] 4
- [Technology platform failure disrupting inter-agency systems] 3
- [Other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatF-Q1
- [1-5] 4
- [6-15] 3
- [16-30] 2
- [31-50] 2
- [50+] 1

### NGO-P2-CatF-Q16
- [multiple-blockchain] 1
- [one-two-donors] 2
- [interested-no-requirements] 3
- [no-interest] 4
- [resistant] 5
- [other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatF-Q5
- [detailed-reports] 2
- [summary-reports] 1
- [narrative-reports] 2
- [basic-reports] 1
- [requirements-vary] 4
- [other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatF-Q7
- [no] 1
- [yes-minor] 2
- [yes-major] 5
- [unsure] 3

### NGO-P2-CatF-Q9
- [smoothly] 1
- [minor-discrepancies] 2
- [significant-issues] 4
- [funding-reduction] 5
- [no-verification] 2
- [other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatG-Q11
- [no] 1
- [attempted] 2
- [breach] 4
- [ransomware] 5

### NGO-P2-CatI-Q1
- [core-focus] 1
- [significant] 2
- [supporting-role] 3
- [minimal] 4
- [not-relevant] 1
- [other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatI-Q8
- [automated-sensors] 1
- [digital-collection] 2
- [manual-digital-entry] 3
- [paper-based] 4
- [no-collection] 5
- [other] 3

### NGO-P2-CatJ-Q11
- [local] 4
- [home] 3
- [international] 2
- [roaming] 1

### NGO-P2-CatJ-Q15
- [safeguarding-failure] 5
- [key-person-dependency] 4
- [credential-fraud] 5
- [staff-poaching] 3
- [no-background-checks] 4
- [volunteer-burnout] 3
- [other] 3

## Appendix B: the signals and gates of each use case

Question id and weight. Fit start, fit gate and readiness gate follow each use case id.

UC-A-001 Cross-border beneficiary payments: fit start 4.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q2 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q3 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q31 0.6

UC-A-002 Staff salary payments across jurisdictions: fit start 2, fit gate 3.5, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.5; NGO-P2-CatA-Q3 0.4; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.3

UC-A-003 Vendor and supplier payments in remote locations: fit start 3.2, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q31 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q2 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.5

UC-A-004 Inter-office fund transfers across country programmes: fit start 1.8, fit gate 3.5, readiness gate 1.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q3 0.5; NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.4
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q8a 0.3

UC-A-005 Emergency rapid-disbursement payments: fit start 4, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q3 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6-followup 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q31 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q30 0.7

UC-A-006 Multi-currency treasury management: fit start 2.8, fit gate 3, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q2 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.6

UC-A-007 Donor fund reconciliation and tracking: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q8a 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q2 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.7

UC-A-008 Real-time financial reporting across programmes: fit start 3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q8a 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.8

UC-A-009 Automated compliance reporting to donors: fit start 3.2, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.6

UC-A-010 Petty cash and field office expense management: fit start 1.5, fit gate 3.5, readiness gate 1.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q31 0.7; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.4
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.3

UC-A-011 Procurement process transparency and audit trails: fit start 3.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.7
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q30 0.6; NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.5

UC-A-012 Smart contract-based vendor payment terms: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.7; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.9
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q2 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.5

UC-A-013 Multi-party approval workflows across time zones: fit start 2.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q30 0.4

UC-A-014 Restricted vs unrestricted fund segregation and tracking: fit start 3.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8a 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.7

UC-A-015 Multi-year grant milestone-based disbursement automation: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q3 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.8

UC-A-016 Sub-grantee fund disbursement and tracking: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q2 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.8
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.7

UC-A-017 Proof of funds deployment (donor accountability): fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q8a 0.5

UC-A-018 Real-time expenditure tracking for donors: fit start 3.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8a 0.7; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.5

UC-A-019 Microfinance and lending to underbanked beneficiaries: fit start 3.8, fit gate 3, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q31 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.5

UC-A-020 Savings group management and record-keeping: fit start 2.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q31 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.3

UC-A-021 Forecast-based financing (anticipatory action): fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q3 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q30 0.7

UC-A-022 Parametric insurance for beneficiaries: fit start 4.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q31 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q30 0.8

UC-A-023 Community currencies and complementary currency systems: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q31 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.7; NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.5

UC-A-024 Currency hedging and stability (stablecoin alternatives): fit start 4.4, fit gate 3, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q3 0.7; NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q2 0.5; NGO-P2-CatA-Q31 0.4

UC-A-025 Insurance for field staff and organisational assets: fit start 4.1, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.75
- need: NGO-P2-CatJ-Q11 1; NGO-P2-CatJ-Q15 0.9
- scale: NGO-P2-CatG-Q1 0.8
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatG-Q11 0.6; NGO-P2-CatA-Q30 0.6; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 0.5

UC-B-024 Beneficiary registration (refugees, stateless, undocumented): fit start 4.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 1; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1c 0.9; NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 0.8; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.6; NGO-P2-CatB-Q8 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.9
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.7

UC-B-025 Birth registration for children born in displacement: fit start 4.3, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 0.9; NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 1
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.7

UC-B-026 Death registration and inheritance documentation: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 0.6; NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 0.8; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.4

UC-B-027 Marriage and family status documentation: fit start 3.2, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 0.5; NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 0.9
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.4
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.3

UC-B-028 Portable service history across borders and organisations: fit start 4.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 1; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1c 0.8; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 1; NGO-P2-CatB-Q10-FU 0.7

UC-B-029 Staff credential verification across jurisdictions: fit start 3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.7; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.6

UC-B-030 Volunteer identity and background verification: fit start 2.8, fit gate 3, readiness gate 1.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.5; NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.3
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.5

UC-B-031 Health worker and teacher certification verification: fit start 3.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 0.9; NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.7

UC-B-032 Implementing partner staff verification: fit start 3.2, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.8; NGO-P2-CatB-Q10-FU 0.7; NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.4

UC-B-033 Educational credentials for displaced students: fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 1; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.8

UC-B-034 Vocational training certificates: fit start 3.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 0.9
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.4
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.3
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.7

UC-B-035 Skills attestation and competency verification: fit start 3.3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 0.8; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.6

UC-B-036 Community governance participation eligibility: fit start 3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 0.6; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1c 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.3
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.5

UC-B-037 Consent records and data sharing permissions: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 1; NGO-P2-CatB-Q6 0.7; NGO-P2-CatB-Q6-FU 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.6

UC-B-038 Age verification for child protection programmes: fit start 3.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q6 0.6

UC-C-039 Medical records (private but verifiable): fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q3 0.8; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.7
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.6; NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.5

UC-C-040 Vaccination history and immunisation records: fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.8; NGO-P2-CatC-Q3 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q5 0.6; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.8

UC-C-041 Mental health and psychosocial support records: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.7

UC-C-042 Gender-based violence and protection case data: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.8; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.8

UC-C-043 Beneficiary deduplication across programmes and organisations: fit start 4.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q5 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q3 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.8
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.9

UC-C-044 Impact data integrity and verification: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.8; NGO-P2-CatC-Q7-FU 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.6; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.5

UC-C-045 Consent management and audit trails: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q3 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.8

UC-C-046 Inter-agency data sharing without centralisation: fit start 4.8, fit gate 1.5, readiness gate 3.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q3 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q7-FU 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.8; NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.5

UC-C-047 Referral pathway tracking across service providers: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.8; NGO-P2-CatC-Q3 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q5 0.6; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.5

UC-C-048 Audit trail maintenance for compliance: fit start 3.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.7

UC-C-049 Research data with beneficiary privacy protection: fit start 3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.8; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.6; NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.5

UC-C-050 Beneficiary feedback data integrity: fit start 3.2, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.8; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.6; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.4

UC-C-051 Needs assessment data integrity: fit start 3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.6

UC-D-052 Medicine authenticity verification (anti-counterfeiting): fit start 4.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q5-FU 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q7 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 0.6; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.7

UC-D-053 Cold chain monitoring for vaccines and medicines: fit start 4.3, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q7 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q7-FU 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.7; NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 0.6; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1b 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.5

UC-D-055 Nutrition supplement tracking: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.7; NGO-P2-CatD-Q7 0.6; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1b 0.5

UC-D-056 Food aid tracking from source to beneficiary: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1b 0.9
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.7; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 0.6; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 0.8

UC-D-057 Donated goods provenance verification: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.5

UC-D-058 In-kind donation tracking and valuation: fit start 3.2, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.7; NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 0.4
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.5

UC-D-059 Shelter materials and non-food item tracking: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1b 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 0.6

UC-D-060 Water, sanitation and hygiene supplies verification: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.7; NGO-P2-CatD-Q5-FU 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1b 0.5

UC-D-061 Equipment and asset lifecycle tracking: fit start 2.5, fit gate 3.5, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.6; NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 0.4
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.3

UC-D-062 Fleet and vehicle management: fit start 2, fit gate 3.5, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.5; NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 0.4
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.3

UC-D-063 Last-mile delivery verification: fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1b 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.5

UC-D-064 Local procurement verification: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q9 0.7; NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 0.5

UC-D-065 Warehouse inventory management: fit start 2.2, fit gate 3.5, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.6; NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.4

UC-D-066 Expiry tracking and waste reduction: fit start 2.8, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.7; NGO-P2-CatD-Q7 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.4

UC-D-067 Smallholder farmer market access and fair trade verification: fit start 4.3, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q9 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 0.6; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.7; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.5

UC-D-068 Aid diversion detection and prevention: fit start 4.3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1b 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q6 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.7

UC-D-069 Beneficiary receipt confirmation (proof of delivery): fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1b 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q2 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.5

UC-D-070 Conflict mineral and material tracking: fit start 4.2, fit gate 3, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q3 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q6 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.9; NGO-P2-CatF-Q16 0.7; NGO-P2-CatF-Q5 0.5

UC-D-071 Customs and import documentation: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q6 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1a 0.7
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.6; NGO-P2-CatF-Q5 0.5

UC-E-068 Voting and decision-making for consortia: fit start 4.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q11 0.9; NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1 0.7
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.6

UC-E-069 Community-based targeting verification: fit start 3.8, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 1; NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.8; NGO-P2-CatE-Q3 0.7; NGO-P2-CatE-Q4 0.6

UC-E-070 Grant allocation across multiple partners: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.9; NGO-P2-CatE-Q11 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.6

UC-E-071 Programme outcome verification: fit start 3.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 1; NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.5

UC-E-072 Whistleblower protection mechanisms: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.9; NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.8
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q9 0.7

UC-E-073 Cross-NGO beneficiary coordination (avoiding gaps and overlaps): fit start 4.5, fit gate 1.5, readiness gate 3.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q7 1; NGO-P2-CatE-Q8 0.9; NGO-P2-CatE-Q8-FU 0.8; NGO-P2-CatE-Q4 0.7; NGO-P2-CatE-Q3 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.7
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.5

UC-E-074 Cluster coordination record-keeping: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1b 0.6; NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 0.7; NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1 0.7

UC-E-075 Beneficiary feedback and complaints mechanisms: fit start 3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.7; NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 0.3
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.5

UC-E-076 Local partner capacity verification: fit start 3.2, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.9; NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.6

UC-E-077 Consortium fund allocation tracking: fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.9; NGO-P2-CatE-Q11 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.8
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.7

UC-E-078 Inter-agency coordination records: fit start 4.5, fit gate 2, readiness gate 3.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 1; NGO-P2-CatE-Q1b 0.7; NGO-P2-CatE-Q7 0.6; NGO-P2-CatE-Q11 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.8
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.9

UC-E-079 Digital public goods infrastructure: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 1; NGO-P2-CatE-Q9 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.7

UC-F-080 Transparent fund flow tracking: fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q30 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q2 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q6 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.8

UC-F-081 Fractional and micro-donation enabling: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q31 0.7; NGO-P2-CatA-Q2 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.4

UC-F-082 Cryptocurrency and digital asset donations: fit start 4.8, fit gate 2, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 0.7; NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.4

UC-F-083 Impact verification tied to specific donations: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 1; NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q6 0.7
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.8

UC-F-084 Automated donor reporting: fit start 3.2, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q8a 0.5

UC-F-085 Crowdfunding with built-in accountability: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q2 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.6

UC-F-086 Corporate giving with verified impact metrics: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q6 0.7
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.5

UC-F-087 Recurring donation automation: fit start 2.5, fit gate 3.5, readiness gate 1.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 0.7; NGO-P2-CatA-Q4 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.3

UC-F-088 Donor-advised fund integration: fit start 2.8, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.7; NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.3
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.6

UC-F-089 Gift matching verification: fit start 3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.6

UC-F-090 Donor identity verification for anti-money laundering compliance: fit start 4, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.9; NGO-P2-CatF-Q9 0.8; NGO-P2-CatF-Q7 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatF-Q1 0.8
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatF-Q16 0.7; NGO-P2-CatA-Q27 0.5

UC-G-090 Early warning systems with automated fund release triggers: fit start 4.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q3 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q30 0.8; NGO-P2-CatE-Q11 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q1 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.8

UC-G-091 Disaster response fund pre-positioning: fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q3 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 0.9
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q30 0.7

UC-G-092 Anticipatory action fund release mechanisms: fit start 4.3, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q3 1; NGO-P2-CatE-Q11 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q6 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q5 0.7
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.9

UC-G-093 Climate adaptation financing: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.9; NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.6

UC-G-094 Conflict-sensitive resource allocation: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q3 1; NGO-P2-CatE-Q4 0.9
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q11 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.9

UC-G-095 Evidence preservation for human rights documentation: fit start 4.5, fit gate 2, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.8
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.5

UC-G-096 Atrocity documentation with chain of custody: fit start 4.7, fit gate 2, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.8
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.7
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.6

UC-G-097 Witness testimony timestamping: fit start 4.3, fit gate 2, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.8; NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.6

UC-G-098 Displacement tracking and verification: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 1; NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 0.9; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1c 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.8

UC-H-099 Land registry and title documentation (post-conflict/disaster): fit start 4.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.8; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q3 0.6

UC-H-100 Property rights documentation for displaced populations: fit start 4.3, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q9 1; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1a 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.7

UC-H-101 Housing, land, and property (HLP) claims tracking: fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q3 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q11 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.8

UC-H-102 Customary land rights documentation: fit start 3.8, fit gate 3, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q9 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 0.8

UC-H-103 Natural resource extraction tracking: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q6 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatD-Q3 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 0.6

UC-H-104 Community benefit sharing from resources: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 1; NGO-P2-CatA-Q29 0.8; NGO-P2-CatA-Q8b 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.7

UC-H-105 Water rights management: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q3 0.9; NGO-P2-CatE-Q4 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q11 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 0.7

UC-H-106 Fishing rights and marine resource access: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 0.8; NGO-P2-CatE-Q3 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q6 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q9 0.6

UC-I-107 Renewable energy certificate tracking and trading: fit start 4.5, fit gate 2, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q5 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.8
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 0.7

UC-I-108 Carbon credit registry and marketplace: fit start 4.5, fit gate 2, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q5 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.9
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.8
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.7; NGO-P2-CatE-Q10 0.7

UC-I-109 Green energy provenance for climate finance: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q6 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.8

UC-I-110 Environmental monitoring data integrity: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 3
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.9
- scale: NGO-P2-CatC-Q3 0.7
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.6

UC-I-111 Circular economy and waste tracking: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 1; NGO-P2-CatD-Q6 0.9
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 0.7; NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatD-Q3 0.4

UC-I-112 Reforestation verification: fit start 4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 1; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatE-Q6 0.7
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.8

UC-I-113 Biodiversity conservation tracking: fit start 3.5, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q4 0.9; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatC-Q3 0.7; NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.4

UC-I-114 Clean cookstove distribution and usage verification: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q4 0.9; NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q6 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1c 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatD-Q3 0.4

UC-J-115 Volunteer management and hour tracking: fit start 2, fit gate 3.5, readiness gate 1.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.3
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.5

UC-J-116 Staff deployment records across locations: fit start 2.5, fit gate 3.5, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.7; NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q3 0.3
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.4

UC-J-117 Training completion records: fit start 2.8, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.6; NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatB-Q3 0.3
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.8

UC-J-118 Safeguarding training verification: fit start 3.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.8; NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.5
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.9

UC-J-119 Security clearance and access management: fit start 3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.9; NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q1 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.6

UC-J-120 Duty of care / staff location tracking in emergencies: fit start 2.5, fit gate 3.5, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatA-Q30 0.8; NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.7; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.6
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P2-CatC-Q6 0.3

UC-J-121 Contractor and consultant verification: fit start 2.8, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2
- need: NGO-P2-CatB-Q1b 0.6; NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.6; NGO-P2-CatC-Q8 0.4
- scale: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1a 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.8

UC-E-080 Board decision recording and verification: fit start 3.4, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q1 0.8; NGO-P2-CatE-Q5 0.7
- scale: NGO-P0-S2-Q9 0.5 (rates 4 only for: [Board of trustees/directors with appointed CEO/ED]; [Federated structure (national affiliates with central coordination)]; [Membership-elected leadership])
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.6; NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.4

UC-E-081 Policy version control and attestation: fit start 3.3, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q2 0.8; NGO-P0-S6-Q20 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [IASC Data Responsibility Guidelines]; [Sphere Standards data protection provisions]; [CHS Alliance data commitments]; [Beneficiary privacy policies (organisation-specific)]; [Internal data governance framework])
- readiness: NGO-P0-S2-Q7 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.6

UC-E-082 Conflict of interest declaration management: fit start 3.2, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q3 0.8; NGO-P0-S2-Q9 0.6 (rates 4 only for: [Board of trustees/directors with appointed CEO/ED]; [Federated structure (national affiliates with central coordination)]; [Membership-elected leadership]; [Founder-led with advisory board]; [Government-appointed or statutory body])
- scale: NGO-P0-S5-Q17b 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.6; NGO-P2-CatC-Q7 0.3

UC-E-083 Standards compliance and accreditation certification: fit start 3.6, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatE-Q4 0.9; NGO-P0-S6-Q20 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [IASC Data Responsibility Guidelines]; [Sphere Standards data protection provisions]; [CHS Alliance data commitments])
- scale: NGO-P0-S4-Q15 0.4 (rates 4 only for: [Institutional donors (USAID, DFID/FCDO, EU, etc.)]; [UN agencies (as a sub-grantee or implementing partner)])
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q12 0.7; NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.5

UC-D-072 Ethical sourcing verification: fit start 3.7, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 0.8; NGO-P2-CatD-Q5 0.8
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q8 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P0-S4-Q15 0.5 (rates 4 only for: [Institutional donors (USAID, DFID/FCDO, EU, etc.)]; [UN agencies (as a sub-grantee or implementing partner)]); NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.4

UC-D-073 Food safety and quality tracking: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P2-CatD-Q3 0.9; NGO-P2-CatD-Q6 0.8
- scale: NGO-P0-S1-Q7 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 0.6

UC-C-052 Whistleblower and reporting channel integrity: fit start 3.5, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P0-S6-Q20 0.6 (rates 4 only for: [IASC Data Responsibility Guidelines]; [Sphere Standards data protection provisions]; [CHS Alliance data commitments]; [Beneficiary privacy policies (organisation-specific)]; [Internal data governance framework])
- scale: NGO-P0-S2-Q7 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q14 0.6

UC-B-039 Cross-agency credential portability for humanitarian workforce: fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P0-S1-Q4 0.9 (rates 4 only for: [UN agency or programme]; [Network or consortium]); NGO-P0-S5-Q18 0.8 (rates 4 only for: [UN OCHA coordination clusters]; [Humanitarian consortium or alliance]); NGO-P2-CatB-Q28 0.5
- scale: NGO-P0-S1-Q7 0.6; NGO-P0-S2-Q7 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatB-Q10 0.6

UC-F-091 Pooled fund disbursement tracking (UN-managed funds): fit start 4, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.75, interagency
- need: NGO-P0-S4-Q15 0.9 (rates 4 only for: [Institutional donors (USAID, DFID/FCDO, EU, etc.)]; [UN agencies (as a sub-grantee or implementing partner)]); NGO-P0-S1-Q4 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [UN agency or programme]; [Network or consortium]); NGO-P2-CatF-Q9 0.7
- scale: NGO-P0-S5-Q17b 0.6; NGO-P0-S4-Q14b 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatA-Q7 0.5

UC-I-115 Co-financed measurement and verification registry (multi-funder climate and conservation programmes): fit start 4.3, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P2-CatI-Q1 0.9; NGO-P0-S4-Q15 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [Institutional donors (USAID, DFID/FCDO, EU, etc.)]; [UN agencies (as a sub-grantee or implementing partner)]; [Corporate partnerships]); NGO-P2-CatI-Q5 0.7
- scale: NGO-P0-S1-Q7 0.4
- fit boost: NGO-P0-S5-Q18 0.5 (rates 4 only for: [Humanitarian consortium or alliance]; [Donor coordination groups]); NGO-P2-CatI-Q8 0.6

UC-D-074 Pooled humanitarian commodity claims and replenishment (UN humanitarian response depots, World Food Programme hubs): fit start 3.9, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P0-S5-Q18 0.9 (rates 4 only for: [UN OCHA coordination clusters]; [Humanitarian consortium or alliance]); NGO-P0-S1-Q4 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [UN agency or programme]; [Red Cross or Red Crescent movement]); NGO-P2-CatD-Q2 0.7
- scale: NGO-P2-CatD-Q1 0.6; NGO-P0-S1-Q7 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P2-CatE-Q13 0.4

UC-E-084 Shared implementing-partner due diligence and sanctions screening: fit start 4.1, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P0-S5-Q17a 0.8 (rates 4 only for: [Yes, extensively (most programmes delivered through partners)]; [Yes, for some programmes]); NGO-P0-S5-Q17b 0.8; NGO-P0-S6-Q21 0.8 (rates 4 only for: [AML/CFT (Anti-Money Laundering/Counter-Financing of Terrorism)]; [OFAC or other sanctions compliance]; [Financial reporting to regulators]); NGO-P0-S5-Q18 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [UN OCHA coordination clusters]; [Humanitarian consortium or alliance]; [Technical working groups (e.g., CaLP, NetHope)]; [Regional NGO networks or platforms]; [Government coordination mechanisms]; [Donor coordination groups])
- scale: NGO-P0-S1-Q4 0.5 (rates 4 only for: [INGO (International NGO with HQ outside Africa)]; [Regional INGO (headquartered in Africa, operating across multiple countries)]; [Network or consortium])
- fit boost: NGO-P0-S5-Q19 0.6 (rates 4 only for: [Yes, regularly and systematically (shared platforms or data exchanges)]; [Yes, but ad hoc (via email, reports, manual processes)]; [We would like to but data protection concerns prevent it])

UC-C-053 Livestock traceability for pastoralists: fit start 4.2, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P0-S1-Q9 1 (rates 4 only for: [Pastoralists and nomadic populations])
- readiness: NGO-P0-S5-Q17a 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [Rarely]; [No, we deliver directly]); NGO-P0-S3-Q13 0.5; NGO-P0-S3-Q13b 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P0-S5-Q25 0.9 (rates 4 only for: [Tadamon (UNDP-IsDB Food Security Accelerator)]); NGO-P0-S1-Q3 0.6 (rates 4 only for: [Post-conflict or transitional context]; [Active conflict or complex emergency]; [Mixed (you operate across several of the above at once)])

UC-D-075 Food voucher tokenisation: fit start 4.4, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P1-S1-Q2 1 (rates 4 only for: [Verifying food assistance reached intended households (vouchers, cash, in-kind food)])
- scale: NGO-P0-S5-Q17b 0.5
- readiness: NGO-P0-S5-Q25b 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [No]; [Not sure]); NGO-P0-S3-Q13 0.6
- fit boost: NGO-P0-S4-Q24 0.9 (rates 4 only for: [Participate in humanitarian cluster system (OCHA-coordinated)]; [Participate in Food Security Cluster specifically]; [Islamic finance instruments (zakat, qard hasan, waqf, sukuk)]); NGO-P0-S5-Q25 0.8 (rates 4 only for: [Tadamon (UNDP-IsDB Food Security Accelerator)])

UC-C-054 Seed system integrity: fit start 3.8, fit gate 2.5, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P1-S1-Q2 0.9 (rates 4 only for: [Counterfeit, adulterated, or unverifiable agricultural inputs (especially seed)]); NGO-P0-S1-Q9 0.8 (rates 4 only for: [Smallholder farmers])
- readiness: NGO-P0-S5-Q18 0.6 (rates 4 only for: [None — we operate independently]); NGO-P0-S3-Q13 0.5
- fit boost: NGO-P0-S5-Q25 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [Tadamon (UNDP-IsDB Food Security Accelerator)])

UC-B-040 Farmer cooperative registry and member digital ID: fit start 4, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P0-S1-Q9 1 (rates 4 only for: [Smallholder farmers]; [Women-led households and women's cooperatives]); NGO-P0-S5-Q17a 0.9 (rates 4 only for: [Yes, extensively (most programmes delivered through partners)]; [Yes, for some programmes])
- readiness: NGO-P0-S6-Q21 0.6 (rates 4 only for: [None beyond basic financial accounting])
- fit boost: NGO-P0-S5-Q25 0.8 (rates 4 only for: [Tadamon (UNDP-IsDB Food Security Accelerator)]); NGO-P0-S4-Q24 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [Islamic finance instruments (zakat, qard hasan, waqf, sukuk)])

UC-A-026 Zakat and interest-free loan (qard hasan) distribution transparency: fit start 4.3, fit gate 3, readiness gate 2.5
- need: NGO-P0-S4-Q24 1 (rates 4 only for: [Islamic finance instruments (zakat, qard hasan, waqf, sukuk)]); TADAMON-P1-Q1 0.9 (never rated: free text)
- scale: NGO-P0-S4-Q14a 0.6
- readiness: NGO-P0-S5-Q18 0.6 (rates 4 only for: [None — we operate independently])
- fit boost: NGO-P0-S5-Q25 0.9 (rates 4 only for: [Tadamon (UNDP-IsDB Food Security Accelerator)])

UC-E-085 Anticipatory action trigger proof: fit start 4, fit gate 2.75, readiness gate 2.5, interagency
- need: NGO-P1-S1-Q2 0.9 (rates 4 only for: [Anticipatory action trigger evidence (drought, flood, displacement) for early disbursement])
- readiness: NGO-P0-S5-Q17a 0.5 (rates 4 only for: [Rarely]; [No, we deliver directly])
- fit boost: NGO-P0-S4-Q24 0.8 (rates 4 only for: [Participate in humanitarian cluster system (OCHA-coordinated)]; [Participate in Food Security Cluster specifically]; [Primarily UN system funding (UNHCR, WFP, UNICEF, UNDP, OCHA)]); NGO-P0-S5-Q25 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [Tadamon (UNDP-IsDB Food Security Accelerator)]); NGO-P0-S1-Q3 0.7 (rates 4 only for: [Post-conflict or transitional context]; [Active conflict or complex emergency]; [Mixed (you operate across several of the above at once)])